Cases 31 - 40 of 790
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. GoBrands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13863
Plaintiff:
Octavio Perez
Defendant:
GoBrands, Inc. and GB Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barghouti v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50327
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy, Susan Tuell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Perez
as 1:2023cv14821
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Vega Perez v. Al Tiro, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05230
Plaintiff:
Juan S. Vega Perez
Defendant:
Al Tiro, Inc. doing business as Altiro Latin Fusion Restaurants and Roberto Avila
Perez v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07667
Plaintiff:
Awilda Perez
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shields v. Mondelez Global LLC
as 1:2023cv03999
Plaintiff:
Michael Shields, Daniel Berndt, Julio Perez and others
Defendant:
Mondelez Global LLC
Petitioner:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Intervenor:
Eric D. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Perez v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11148
Plaintiff:
Lena Perez
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
