Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Powell v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04188
Plaintiff:
Harold Powell
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Telford v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04185
Plaintiff:
Mark Telford
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04189
Plaintiff:
Michael Hansen
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04191
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lewis
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04192
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Dunn
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04190
Plaintiff:
James Vance
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lieberman v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv04183
Plaintiff:
Brad Lieberman
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Liberty Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bierman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Sophia M Bierman
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pary, Christopher v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pary v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
