Cases 31 - 40 of 1,067
Maxwell v. Shifrin et al
as 4:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maxwell
Defendant:
Craig Shifrin, Richard Travis, Amy Louck Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Travis Clark and Susan Clark
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Richard Gansz v. Nick Manns, et al
as 24-1176
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GANSZ
Defendant:
NICK MANNS, Sheriff, JASON HEWITT, Correctional Officer, TRAVIS WELLER, Correctional Officer and others
Juan Reyes v. Leonta Jackson, et al
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JUAN REYES
Defendant:
LEONTA JACKSON, Warden, MARY CERDA and TRAVIS BANTISTA
WARREN et al v. HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN, JR., LOREN LEWIS, JEFFREY SARVER and others
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF and HOWARD COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Travis Patterson, Jr.
as 24-1083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS M. PATTERSON, JR.
Swiderek v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Travis Andrew Swiderek
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
William Burn Howard
Defendant:
James Smith, Chad Marsh, Kevin Galebaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
