Cases 41 - 50 of 3,600
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kampf v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Kampf
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODGERS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
ROBERT RODGERS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sowder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Robert Sowder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Ronell L Roberts
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Sheriff
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Robert Sowder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert Sowder
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Vicki Elaine Becker, Goshen Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowder v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert Sowder
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Vicki Elaine Becker, Goshen Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS
Defendant:
MELISSA RUTLEDGE, BRYAN VANDERVORT and ISAAC RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
