Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Maiorino v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04484
Plaintiff:
Thomas Maiorino
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Raina C. Borrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodwin v. Knox County Jail
as 4:2021cv04117
Plaintiff:
Marcelus Edward Goodwin
Defendant:
Knox County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamie Green v. Naveen Rajoli, et al
as 21-2263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIE R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES OF INDIANA L.L.C, NURSE COURTNEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Goodwin v. Knox County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
Marcelus Edward Goodwin
Defendant:
Knox County Jail and Police Procedures Administration Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Smith v. Courtney Goodwin, et al
as 20-3315
Defendant / Appellee:
COURTNEY GOODWIN, Director, Housing Mapelton Fall Creek Dev. Corp, KRIS GREEN, Manager, Goodwill of central and Southern Indiana, RICK RUBLE, Commissioner Department of Labor, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL D. SMITH
Goodwin III, Julius v. Dane County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00980
Plaintiff:
Julius Alfred Goodwin III
Defendant:
Lawrence Thomas and Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin III, Julius v. Dane County Jail
as 3:2020cv01026
Plaintiff:
Julius Alfred Goodwin III
Defendant:
Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin III, Julius v. Dane County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00970
Plaintiff:
Julius Alfred Goodwin III
Defendant:
Dane County Jail, Nurse Jennifer and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
