Cases 41 - 50 of 268
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05411
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Quanzhou Makebeiluo Shoes And Clothing Co., Ltd., Changsha Guoying Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GRIGSBY v. HAMMER
as 2:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
DONNY LELAND GRIGSBY, JR.
Defendant:
J. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2021cv04860
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Fanshu House Store, For your Art Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jenkins v. Greene et al
as 3:2021cv03196
Plaintiff:
Louis Jenkins
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Justin Hammers, . Boots and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Kirk et al
as 3:2021cv03152
Plaintiff:
Louis Jenkins
Defendant:
. Kirk, . Settles, . Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv03140
Defendant:
Brant Mountain, Warden Cameron Watson, Rob Jeffreys and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettis v. Hammer et al
as 3:2021cv50179
Defendant:
Wiersema, Cruz, C Pendley and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Antwon Bettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Troy Hammer v. Samantha Schwartz-Oscar, et al
as 21-1718
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE WIJAS, GREGORY FRIEDEL, SAMANTHA SCHWARTZ-OSCAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY G. HAMMER
Dardagan v. Greene
as 1:2021cv01317
Respondent:
Justin Hammers and Brittany Greene
Petitioner:
Suvad Dardagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
