Cases 41 - 50 of 486
ROBINSON v. SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Alex Hale
Defendant:
Quinton Davis, Joshua Robinson and Kritlen
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02404
Plaintiff:
MELISSA R ROBINSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Robinson v. Dekalb Co.
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Robinson
Defendant:
Dekalb Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
K.R. v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02186
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
R. et al
as 1:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
R. et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STITTS v. O'CONNER
as 1:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
TURAMA STITTS
Defendant:
ROBINSON O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
