Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Monroy et al v. Gross
as 1:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nery Monroy, Jose Monroy, Antonia Perez-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Crystal Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07357
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCDERMOTT, JACK WILKINS, K Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Kehinda Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv03225
Plaintiff:
Karen Jo Gross
Interested Party:
SSAOGC and CSS-Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Brown v. Prentice et al
as 1:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Prentice, Jenkins and Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2018cv01213
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Furlow, Mulholland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Prentice et al
as 1:2018cv03584
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Prentice, Jenkins and Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Mulholland et al
as 3:2018cv01064
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Mr Mulholland, William Qualls, Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Threadgille et al
as 3:2017cv01384
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Threadgille, Yankey, Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff, Freud, Breems & Nelson Ltd. v. O'Malley Gross
as 1:2017cv09013
Plaintiff:
Ruff, Freud, Breems & Nelson Ltd.
Defendant:
Joan O'Malley Gross
Counter_claimant:
Joan O'Malley Gross
Counter_defendant:
Ruff, Freud, Breems & Nelson Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross v. FCA US LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04889
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Zachary M. Nicholson
Plaintiff:
Maximilian I. Gross
Counter_claimant:
Zachary M. Nicholson
Counter_defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
