Cases 41 - 50 of 345
Luster-Hoskins v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2022cv02245
Plaintiff:
Angel Luster-Hoskins
Defendant:
Pat Hartshorn, Young, Bobbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Burgess et al
as 2:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
Lt Burgess, CO Holzhueter, CO Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00874
Petitioner:
James Hoskins
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hoskins v. Ertl et al
as 2:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
James Hoskins
Defendant:
Christopher Ertl, Owen Piotrowski, Thomas Deboer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Gentner et al
as 3:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
DeShaun Lamonte Hoskins
Defendant:
Gage Gentner and Timothy Bessinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Flakes et al
as 3:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Austin Knight
Defendant:
Flakes, Borolov, Cheeks and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Hoskins v. Nathan Chapman
as 22-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA HOSKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN CHAPMAN, Doctor, Dentist, Pickneyville CC
Hoskins v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00940
Plaintiff:
Earl Hoskins
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Hoskins
as 1:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nathaniel Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
