Cases 41 - 50 of 602
Rodriguez v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04235
Plaintiff:
George Rodriguez
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Readerlink Distribution Services, LLC v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03881
Plaintiff:
Readerlink Distribution Services, LLC
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCarter v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
Brandon McCarter
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. MENARD, INC.,
as 1:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hopp, Raymond v. MJC America, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hopp
Defendant:
MJC America, Ltd., Gree USA, Inc., Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliance Sales, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marino-Kalish v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02991
Plaintiff:
Gina Marino-Kalish
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc. a Wisconsin corporation doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campbell v. Menard Inc d/b/a Menards
as 2:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Eugene Campbell
Defendant:
Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Holland v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02837
Plaintiff:
Alphard Holland
Defendant:
MENARD, INC., and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
