Cases 41 - 50 of 1,289
Hollins, Emon v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Emon V. Hollins
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett, Nicholas v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bennett
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Striegel, Drew v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Drew Striegel
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson, Jamie v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anderson
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weiner v. Chojnacki et al
as 1:2023cv16573
Plaintiff:
David Weiner
Defendant:
Marcin Chojnacki, Laurena Mikosz, ROBERT RIXER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Jarre H, Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Murphy
as 1:2023cv16279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darius Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Avitia v. City Of Chicago, et al
as 1:2023cv15957
Plaintiff:
Christian Avitia
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Bernard Lee Jr., Tim Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. Pessina et al
as 1:2023cv15654
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, John A Lederer, Dominic Murphy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
