Cases 41 - 50 of 1,639
Stanbridge v. Battington et al
as 4:2024cv04061
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Stanbridge
Defendant:
T Battington, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Sandhu et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kerry Coley
Defendant:
Dentist Sandhu, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Vinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxey v. Burrell et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
LaMarr Maxey
Defendant:
Dr Burrell and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie v. Ek et al
as 4:2024cv04043
Plaintiff:
Robert Ollie, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kurt Osmundson, D Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles E Thornton
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wexford Health Sources Inc.
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Machon Anderson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sillas v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Stanton Sillas
Defendant:
Dr. Myers, Dr. David, John Barwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Sy et al
as 3:2024cv50031
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Terrell
Defendant:
Dr. Sy, NP Tuell, NP Mershad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Henze et al
as 1:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joseph Boyce
Defendant:
Marlene Henze, Boutista, Helen Bruckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
