Cases 41 - 50 of 9,560
Jenkins v. Kim et al
as 1:2024cv03310
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Young Kim, Donna Petrauskis, Wellpath LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv04703
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Barry Chester Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Austin Jr. v. Mason et al
as 1:2024cv04692
Plaintiff:
Dwight Austin Jr.
Defendant:
William Mason, Village of Lansing and Unknown and Unnamed Village of Lansing Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Roxana Church of the Nazarene et al
as 3:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
William Ray Rogers
Defendant:
Roxana Church of the Nazarene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen Monrose
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, K Joyner, Nikki Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Barwick
as 3:2024cv50218
Plaintiff:
Marvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2024pq01447
Plaintiff:
Janice Clark and Cathleen Williams
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rush
Defendant:
Bryan Helfrich, Brandon Walls, David Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Terell Davison
Defendant:
Carothers Bailey, Mark Williams and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
