Cases 41 - 50 of 651
ALLEN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
LAWSON ALLEN
Defendant:
LANE and WEISINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Loreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07138
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Lane
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Softsheen Carson, LLC and others
Executor:
Alysia Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv07178
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Loera, Acey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00811
Petitioner:
Willie Lane
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MULLIS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02741
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lane
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOLDEN-FIELDS v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
NICKI GOLDEN-FIELDS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Menard Inc
as 1:2023cv04959
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lane
Defendant:
Menard Inc a Wisconsin Corporation doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aziz Booker v. Chelsea Gotz, et al
as 23-2416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZIZ RAHIM BOOKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHELSEA FOX GOTZ, MICHELLE LANE, PATRICIA A. RILEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
