Cases 51 - 60 of 3,261
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fields v. Knox County
as 4:2024cv04029
Petitioner:
Niecia M Fields
Respondent:
Knox County
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FLYNN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
DEANDRE FLYNN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Szczepaniak v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Marcin Maciej Szczepaniak
Defendant:
Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WHITE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. WHITE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Greene
as 2:2024cv02018
Petitioner:
Kevin James
Respondent:
Brittney Greene
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
