Cases 51 - 60 of 130
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR et al
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
ROBERT E CARTER JR, DAUSS, INDIANA DEPT CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
AARON J. SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER JR., JAMES BASINGER, W. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
RA'MAR DANIELS
Defendant:
T. SOLOMON, J. D. BALLENGER, C. WARGNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. PHFLEEGER et al
as 2:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
PHFLEEGER, ASHBY, GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERTLE, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT and GREATHOUSE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, PHFLEEGER, ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
