Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Myers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Darryl Myers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Bret Mize, Chuck Penfold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frohwerk v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Frohwerk
Defendant:
Bobby Johnson, Rhonda Vega, Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norington v. Daniels et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Norington
Defendant:
Mitchell E Daniels, Jr, Edwin G Buss, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Darryl Myers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Brett Mize, Chuck Penfold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Levanhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Vaughn
Defendant:
Superintendent Levanhagen, K Mapps, S Hert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. STINE et al
as 1:2010cv01602
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DEATON, JENNIFER FRENCH, CHUCK PENFOLD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLETCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLETCHER v. STINE et al
as 1:2010cv01204
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DEATON, JENNIFER FRENCH, CHUCK PENFOLD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLETCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01196
Respondent:
EDWIN G. BUSS, WENDY KNIGHT and C.A. PENFOLD
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURCHETT v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01161
Petitioner:
PHILLIP D. BURCHETT
Respondent:
EDWIN BUSS, WENDY KNIGHT and C.A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
