Cases 51 - 60 of 2,278
Cabe et al v. Evergreen Packaging LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Cabe, Sean Frey, Anita Poteete and others
Defendant:
Evergreen Packaging LLC and Pactiv Evergreen Inc.
Singleton v. Wagner et al
as 1:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Dirk Singleton
Defendant:
Wagner, Shinn, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al
as 24-1192
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
CARIBE TRANSPORT II, LLC, YOSNIEL VARELA-MOJENA, C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Howard Robinson
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, GUANGFA MAOYI STORE, Maripa-US and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Sennings et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo T Moore
Defendant:
Chad Sennings, Loy Williams, Dr Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
