Cases 61 - 70 of 143
CRAIG, KELLY & FAULTLESS, LLC v. TURNER, SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
CRAIG, KELLY & FAULTLESS, LLC
Defendant:
TURNER, SCOTT, HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL, d/b/a, HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH, RECEIVABLES MNGT. PARTNERS, LLC, ASSIGNEE HENDRICKS CO. HOSP. d/b/a, ORTHOPEDIC SPORT MED. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FISK v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
JIMMY TYRONE FISK
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LIMON v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00500
Petitioner:
JUAN LIMON
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALVAREZ v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO ALVAREZ
Defendant:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
YOUNG v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
EMORY YOUNG
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DECKER v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GALLAGHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN NICHOLAS GALLAGHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DOMINICK, A. BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOFFMAN v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
MONTE HOFFMAN
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLINKENBEARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH DALE CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
T. RULE and AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
