Cases 61 - 70 of 190
Ahamad Atkins v. USA
as 19-2062
Petitioner / Appellant:
AHAMAD R. ATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sinclair Atkins, Jr. v. Elizabeth Trueblood
as 19-2094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SINCLAIR L. ATKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH TRUEBLOOD
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Atkins et al
as 1:2019cv03896
Defendant:
T.J. Grimaldi, John D Atkins and McIntyre Thanasides Briggold Elliot Grimaldi Guito & Matthews, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ATKINS v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. ATKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chemetco Site PRP Group v. A Square Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Agresta, LLC, A&B Recycling, Inc., Berger & Company Recycling, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chemetco Site Prp Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Atkins v. Garcia et al
as 1:2019cv01227
Defendant:
Stanley Figus, Jose Cardo, Davor Mitrovic and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2019cv02091
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
Patricia Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2019cv00808
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waters vs LSC Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08419
Plaintiff:
Joe Waters
Defendant:
M. Shan Atkins, Thomas J Quinlan III, Judith H Hamilton and others
ATKINS v. TRUEBLOOD
as 2:2018cv00554
Defendant:
ELIZABETH TRUEBLOOD
Plaintiff:
SINCLAIR LANDON ATKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
