Cases 61 - 70 of 114
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00230
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00227
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00222
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00225
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00223
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPIKES v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00220
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
JAMES SPIKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00226
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00228
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00216
Plaintiff:
DUVELL EVERETT, DARNELL WESLEY MOON, ARNOLD L. PAIGE and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAROL HOLINKA, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOON et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00217
Defendant:
C. COYLE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
DUVELL EVERETT, DARNELL WESLEY MOON, ARNOLD L. PAIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.