Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04908
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, 454ngyu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SMITH v. SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
as 3:2016cv00040
Defendant:
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CHARLES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv00329
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, MONICA GIPSON, MICHAEL OSBURN and others
Plaintiff:
ELMER DEFORY CHARLES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Roberson
as 2:2015cv02196
Petitioner:
Jared Michael Smith
Respondent:
Kess Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Butler et al
as 3:2015cv00770
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
K Butler, J Hecht, Lt. Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
Unknown Party, S A Godinez, Rick Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04905
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Laura Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Butler et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Kim Butler, Lisa Madigan and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYDEN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv01913
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, D. DEWENGER, TRINA RANDALL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HAYDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
