Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Lisowe v. CVS Pharmacy Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00523
Plaintiff:
Ralph Alvin Lisowe
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc, Tiffiny, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kingston v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2014cv09628
Plaintiff:
Mary Kingston
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Staub et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv60038
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Staub and Jefferson Finney
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Walgreen Co and CVS Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowe et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03687
Plaintiff:
Carl Lowe and Kearby Kaiser
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and MinuteClinic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Mashni et al
as 1:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
David Mashni and Ruth Mashni
Third_party_defendant:
Catamaran LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Ford v. CVS Pharmacy Inc
as 3:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Patty Ford
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
