Cases 71 - 80 of 345
VELEZ v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
ANGELO VELEZ, JR.
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY A. BERRY, II
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY, HUGHETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01584
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
MURPHY EDWARDS
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
RICKY WALLACE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADY v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRADY
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, DAVID LIEBEL, DUSHAN ZATECKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, T. PHEGLEY and T. HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Boyd v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK L. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., KRISTEN DAUSS, Doctor, ANGELA REAVES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
