Cases 71 - 80 of 96
ABDUL-WADOOD et al v. BUSSE et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
LOKMAR Y. ABDUL-WADOOD, JAMES J. BARRETT, DAVE CALLOWAY and others
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, T. BEAN, JERRY BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv08056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Trotter Wellness, LTD. v. Preventure, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00670
Plaintiff:
Trotter Wellness, LTD.
Defendant:
Preventure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Booker-El v. Trotter et al
as 3:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Sammie L Booker-El
Defendant:
Delray Trotter, Wayne Peoples, Bill Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Builder's Concrete & Supply, et al v. Boyle Construction Management,, et al
as 09-8040
Petitioner:
IRVING MATERIALS, INCORPORATED, FRED R. IRVING, PRICE IRVING and others
Respondent:
BOYLE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, R. SHANE THARP, CWE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED and others
Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Trotter Landscape Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04225
Plaintiff:
Laborers Pension Fund, Laborers Pension Fund, Laborers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Trotter Landscape Company, Inc. and David Trotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
