Cases 81 - 90 of 154
James Lewis v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 13-3282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, VICTOR D. TRANCOSO, Major, ROBERT A. PICKETT, Officer and others
Odom v. Champaign Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv02230
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Odom
Defendant:
Champaign Police Department, Anthony Cobb, Jeffery Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01417
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Pizzarro Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Hughes et al
as 1:2013cv04597
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Taylor
Defendant:
Ricky A. Hughes, Kevin R. Johnson, Russell E. White, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Lewis v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 13-1850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, VICTOR D. TRANCOSO, Major, ROBERT A. PICKETT, Officer and others
Ozzie Pickett v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 13-1647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OZZIE PICKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, ANNE MCELROY, SHARYN ELMAN and others
Pickett v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Trolus Pickett
Defendant:
Mohamed Mansour, Manisha Patel, Correction Officer Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Luis Jose Castro
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, G.K. Pickett and R.L. Jancevich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickett v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv01285
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Anne McElroy, Joseph Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv09721
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Anne McElroy, Joseph Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
