Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Duncan v. Quin et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Duncan
Defendant:
Pat Quin, S.A. Godinez, Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv03500
Petitioner:
Deion L. Turner
Respondent:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Illinois Dept. of Correction Parole Agency and Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Pardieck et al
as 1:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Terry Gill
Defendant:
Shawn Pardieck, IDOC Prisoner Review Board and Unknown Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois State Police, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2014cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Quinn et al
as 3:2014cv00254
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cross
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, S A Godinez, Illinois Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv01472
Petitioner:
Bryan J Thomas
Respondent:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Kevwe Akpore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Carter v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
as 13-3015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD
Morgan v. Prison Review Board
as 3:2013cv03311
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan
Defendant:
Prison Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Prisoner Review Board
as 3:2013cv03291
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan
Defendant:
Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
