Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Gorbey v. United States, et al
as 22-3206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, OFFICER DOLS, COUNSELOR BARMES and others
Michael Gorbey v. Mr. Barmes, et al
as 22-3173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR BARMES, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, USP Thomson, ASSOCIATE WARDEN KING, USP Thomson and others
Michael Gorbey v. Mark Morgan, et al
as 22-3045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK MORGAN, Medical Doctor, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv50348
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, Bergami, King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gorbey v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50330
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
United States, Dols, Barmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
United States, . Dols, . Barmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Barmes et al
as 3:2022cv50322
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Barmes, Bergami, King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Acosta v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv50194
Defendant:
Walls, Root, Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Hanoi Barbaro Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARMES v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BARMES
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BARMES v. MAJESTIC MOTORS, INC
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BARMES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC MOTORS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
