Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
Tonya S Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. USA
as 4:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mark Byrd v. Marliana Munoz, et al
as 24-1618
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BYRD
Defendant:
MARLIANA MUNOZ, MACKENZIE PRATT, DANIELLE FALETTI and others
Pratt v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv02816
Plaintiff:
Tangenika Pratt
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, L'ORAL USA PRODUCTS, INC., SoftSheen-Carson LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Damion McKissick v. Tanya Walton Pratt
as 24-1418
Petitioner:
DAMION MCKISSICK
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT
ROACH et al v. ESTATE OF KEVIN R. KOOGLER et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
GERALD L ROACH, EMMA J ROACH, GERALD L. ROACH and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF KEVIN R. KOOGLER, CHEESEMAN LLC, CORRUGATED LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
PAYNE v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
LEMONTE E. PAYNE
Defendant:
IDOC, PRATT and HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maverick Young v. Tanya Walton Pratt
as 23-3391
Petitioner:
MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
