Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallahan v. Rayl et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joesph Hallahan
Defendant:
Kevin Rayl, Justin Bertrand, Johnathan Crow-Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Kelvin Carter
Respondent:
Crystal Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zepeda v. Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Source, Inc., Christine Brown and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
TANNER CROW
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Crowe
as 1:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Cortez D Williams
Respondent:
Crystal Crowe
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett Jr. v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jay Bennett Jr. and Jay Bennett, Jr.
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Christal Crow, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Giovann Jones
Respondent:
Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Harrison v. Christel Crow
as 24-1097
Applicant:
WILLIE J. HARRISON
Respondent:
CHRISTEL CROW, Warden
Fredeal Truidalle v. David Mitchell, et al
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
FREDEAL TRUIDALLE
Defendant:
DAVID MITCHELL, CRYSTAL CROW, DANA NEWTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
