Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tabatha Washington, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-2467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TABATHA WASHINGTON and DONTE HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, VINCENT ALONZO, ADRIAN GARCIA and others
Caston v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv05918
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner, Houston Live Stock and Radio, Olympic Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ochoa v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv02977
Defendant:
Eugene Schleder, City Of Chicago, Adrian Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00442
Defendant:
Vincent Alonzo, City Of Chicago, Demosthenes Balodimas and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Howard and Tabatha Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. GGC, Inc.
as 3:2017cv50003
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia
Defendant:
GGC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Kurinec et al
as 1:2016cv07602
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia Martinez
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Michael Kurinec and Village of Indian Head Park, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2014cv02311
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Brooks, Martin Roman, Adrian Garcia and others
Defendant:
Timothy Bukowski, Chad Koliwenzew, M Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2010cv07898
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia Rangel
Defendant:
Denise Schmidt, James McCormick, Thomas K. Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2010cv07022
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia Rangel
Defendant:
Denise Schmidt, Thomas K. Schmidt, The Wesleyan Church Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rangel v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Adrian Garcia Rangel
Defendant:
Thomas Schmidt, Northern Michigan District of the Wesleyan Church, Indiana Wesleyan University and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
