Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STARR v. CHURCH CHURCH HITTLE & ANTRIM et al
as 1:2011cv00596
Defendant:
CHURCH CHURCH HITTLE & ANTRIM, JACK G. HITTLE and ALEXANDER PINEGAR
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
STARR v. STURTEVANT
as 1:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Defendant:
JUDGE WAYNE STURTEVANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
STARR v. GELLER
as 1:2011cv00598
Defendant:
STEVEN B. GELLER
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
STARR v. KONICKI INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Defendant:
LESLIE KONICKI, KONICKI INC. and BETH WARREN
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
STARR v. HAMILTON CO. INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00687
Defendant:
CLERK TAMMY BAITZ, HAMILTON CO. INDIANA, LORI B. KETNER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STARR v. BURTON et al
as 1:2010cv00689
Defendant:
CONGRESSMAN DAN BURTON and CONGRESSMAN JOE DONNELLY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STARR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2010cv00688
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STARR v. CITY OF NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00686
Defendant:
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, T.W. HENDRICKS, CURT KINMAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STARR v. ALDRIDG et al
as 1:2010cv00690
Defendant:
2ND MARSHAL PRESENT ON JUNE 5, 2008 and U.S. MARSHAL BRIAN ALDRIDGE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STARR v. CITY OF NOBLESVILLE et al
as 1:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Defendant:
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE, COUNTY OF HAMILTON, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
