Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Pfeifer v. Armark Food Corp et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Bruce Demar Pfeifer, Jr
Defendant:
Armark Food Corp, Micheal Shapiro, Russ Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tyreese Guyton
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Russ Olmstead, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miranda v. Ruby's Fast Food Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv05453
Plaintiff:
Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda
Defendant:
Ruby's Fast Food Corp. and Nickie Rodica
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortega v. 313 Food Corp. d/b/a Randall's Pancake House et al
as 1:2022cv04218
Plaintiff:
Celso Ortega
Defendant:
313 Food Corp. d/b/a Randall's Pancake House, Francisco Garcia and Anthony Cascio-Mariana
Giant Eagle Inc v. Agri Stats Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04187
Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle Inc
Defendant:
Agri Stats Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, Hormel Foods Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv05037
Defendant:
Axis Automation, LLC and Axis Automation Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carando Gourmet Frozen Foods Corp., Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Taboun, Inc. v. Taboon Restaurant Corp et al
as 1:2017cv03616
Plaintiff:
Taboun, Inc.
Defendant:
Taboon Restaurant Corp and Pocket Foods Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Foulds, Inc. v. Catelli Foods Corp.
as 1:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
Foulds, Inc.
Defendant:
Catelli Foods Corp.
Counter_claimant:
Catelli Foods Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Foulds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
