Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 1:2024cv05321
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al.
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Moore, Sr. v. AutoZone Parts, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moore, Sr.
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Eugene C. Menges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fels v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv06187
Defendant:
Arlene Jezirny, Autozone Inc, Kwame Radul and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander A. Fels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tanner v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08367
Plaintiff:
Sara Tanner
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Messel et al v. Viad Corp et al
as 1:2015cv11344
Defendant:
Viad Corp , ABB Inc, AGCO Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Francis Messel, Jr. and Bernadette Marie Messel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dancor Construction, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10374
Plaintiff:
Dancor Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
