Cases 1 - 10 of 509
BOYLES v. SCOTT COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF
as 4:2024cv00170
Defendant:
SCOTT COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF
Plaintiff:
AARON KELLY BOYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlow v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Defendant:
CO, Snow, English and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Harlow and Aaron Justin Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlow v. Hamlyn et al
as 3:2024cv00956
Defendant:
Hensley, MAT Comitty, Amber Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Justin Harlow and Aaron Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. LANE et al
as 1:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
AARON M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CINDY WISNER, CHRISTOPHER LANE and SHANE HICKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotto v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00921
Defendant:
Katina Murray, Joshua Snow, Montrel McGee and others
Plaintiff:
David Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv01955
Defendant:
MIKE KENNEDY, RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL and BRENT GREER
Plaintiff:
AARON SCOTT MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Randolph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Miller
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail, Brent Greer and Mike Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDOM v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv01855
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Plaintiff:
AARON WINDOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. MARION COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv01760
Defendant:
AARON RAMOS, MARION COUNTY, IMPD and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Marion County Justice Center et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Andre Perry
Defendant:
Marion County, IMPD, Marion County Justice Center and others
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
