Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Calloway
as 1:2019cv02324
Respondent:
People Of The State Of Illinois and Victor Calloway
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv01195
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
J Davis, Susan Prentince, . Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Cangiolos et al
as 1:2017cv08563
Plaintiff:
Darrell Sanders
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas Cangiolos, CRST Dedicated Services , CRST Flatbed Regional Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2016cv03193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office, State of Illinois, Karen Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, M Abernathy, D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Stith et al
as 3:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Antwan Stith and Village of Washington Park IL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dorothy
as 1:2015cv04495
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas
Respondent:
Stephanie Dorothy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Twilight Records Inc. et al v. Raymond et al
as 1:2013cv07057
Plaintiff:
Twilight Records Inc. , Syl-Zel Music Inc. and Syl Johnson
Defendant:
Usher Raymond, Bryan Sledge, William Jonathan Drayton and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
United States of America v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv03799
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
