Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Chamberlain v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 3:2023cv03454
Plaintiff:
Wayne L. Chamberlain
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EVANS v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
REBECCA EVANS
Defendant:
BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPARELL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boynton v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04624
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Office Depot, Inc., Officemax North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Boynton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC v. STRATMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER STRATMAN and SITEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olinger et al v. Menard Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Menard Inc. and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gary Olinger and Gail Olinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martinez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 1:2020cv00336
Plaintiff:
Silvia Martinez
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
as 2:2019cv00503
Plaintiff:
SHANNON L. WRIGHT
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gooch v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jane H Gooch
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
