Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walker v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01677
Plaintiff:
Charles Walker
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02490
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
CHARLES WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00843
Plaintiff:
William Burke , Vernon Bowling , Isaac Johnson and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2015cv01903
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
CHARLES WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Walker v. Kathy Griffin
as 15-2147
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY GRIFFIN, Superintendent
Charles Walker v. Marilyn O. Marshall
as 14-1241
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: CHARLES WALKER
Trustee - Appellant:
MARILYN O. MARSHALL
WALKER v. SEVIER
as 1:2013cv01476
Respondent:
MARK R. SEVIER
Petitioner:
CHARLES WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Amer Civil Liberties, et al v. Chgo, Cty of, et al
as 1:1975cv03295
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, Inc. , American Friends Service Committee , Better Government Association and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The , Richard J Daley, James M Rochford and others
Movant:
Chicago Tribune Company , Terrence Doherty and Michael McGann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
