Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Courtney v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv02195
Plaintiff:
Sean Courtney
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Carreon et al
as 4:2024cv04152
Defendant:
Gerald Carreon, Eleanor Schupick, Nicole Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. JTH Tax LLC
as 1:2024cv06890
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lane and JTH Tax LLC doing business as Liberty Tax Service
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Courtney v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv02182
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Sean Courtney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Carreon et al
as 4:2024cv04109
Defendant:
Courtney Rhoades, Cora Bezold, Nicole Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv05241
Plaintiff:
Courtney Wright
Defendant:
Mrs. Hiety, Mrs. Cunningham, Ms.Taylor Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
Jennifer Rold, John Doe's 1-11 and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ealy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv04091
Defendant:
Micheal Hyman, Sanjay Tailor and Sharon Oden Johnson
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01143
Plaintiff:
Courtney Edwards
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
