Cases 1 - 10 of 6,331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2024cv12213
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Raynell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evans v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv12160
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Leilani Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Tatum v. People of the State of Illinois, The - Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv12151
Defendant:
Gavin Quinn, Enyinnaya O. Nwagwu, Robert Holland and others
Plaintiff:
William Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv12079
Defendant:
Petros Visvardis, Joseph Torres and The City of Chicago Heights
Plaintiff:
Jamar E. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernton v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv12045
Defendant:
A. Alvarez, Humberto Cruz and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Shajuan Hernton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinton v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv12017
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hinton
Defendant:
John Doe, Matthew O. Bryant and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohran v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11917
Plaintiff:
Ceresa Cohran
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., City Of Chicago and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Juan Mendez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-3110
Defendant:
DAVID COOK, CHRISTIAN SZCZUR and CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff:
JUAN MENDEZ
Woods v. Ferantella #11403 et al
as 1:2024cv11592
Defendant:
Ofc. John Doe, P.O. Rodriguez #14262, Ofc. Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
