Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Davis v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Deandre Davis
Defendant:
C/O Baker, Christopher Kern, Matthew Dulaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakaturski v. Director et al
as 3:2023cv03609
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bakaturski
Defendant:
Director, Ashley Oneil, Darren Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware-Mustapha v. Counselor Brown
as 1:2023cv15387
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
Counselor Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ware-Mustapha v. Counselor Brown
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
Counselor Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brisco v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Does & Jane Does, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel Ruiz v. Catalino Bautista, et al
as 23-1687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISRAEL RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CATALINO BAUTISTA, PAULA YOUNG, Nurse, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Sharples v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharples
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Lt. Bebout, Lt. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Haselmeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Major Haselmeyer, Jackie Stveve, Counselor/Officer Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
