Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Stahl v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Stahl
Defendant:
Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc. and Jay D. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Evans et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv14686
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Evans and Fatimah M Evans
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Unidentified Chicago Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Evans et al v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a/ JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10438
Plaintiff:
Ingrid D. Evans and Albert Swift, Jr.
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a/ JF Labs, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08140
Plaintiff:
Vertie D. Evans
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Evans v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02033
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James D. Evans
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Evans et al
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
D Evans and B Brnicky
Plaintiff:
Herman L Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv04191
Petitioner:
Cynthia D Evans
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Devan Evans
as 20-2271
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVAN D. EVANS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Devan Evans
as 20-2270
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVAN D. EVANS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Cynthia Evans
as 19-2891
Defendant / Appellant:
CYNTHIA D. EVANS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
