Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jordan v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Jeremiah Brown, David Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv01765
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wright
Defendant:
David Vaughn and Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeVail Givens v. David Vaughn, et al
as 20-2555
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN B. DUNCAN, DAVID VAUGHN, STEVE KEIM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVAIL GIVENS
Ruffin v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv01774
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, T. Kittle, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Mwamba M. Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morecraft v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Morecraft
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Nicholas Lamb, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givens v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Levail Givens
Defendant:
David Vaughn, Steve Keim, Steve Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEATON VAN LINES, INC. et al v. FAULK-COLLIER MOVING & STORAGE, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
BEKINS VAN LINES, INC. and WHEATON VAN LINES, INC.
Defendant:
FAULK-COLLIER MOVING & STORAGE, LLC and DAVID VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Strickland v. Godinez et al
as 3:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
Erik C Strickland
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Ty Bates, Donald Gatez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cebertowicz v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H Cebertowicz
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez, Marc Hodge, David Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Widmer v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Michael Widmer
Defendant:
David Vaughn and Marcus Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
