Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HARDING v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
as 1:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
HEIDI HARDING
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MONTEZ v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00720
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSE MONTEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CAFFEE et al v. KING et al
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
BROOKE D. CAFFEE, IN and SUSAN HAWKINS, IN
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC., OH and MARTIN R. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stalbaum v. Kruse et al
as 3:2014cv03053
Plaintiff:
Dennis Stalbaum
Defendant:
Robert Kruse , Dayton Freight Lines, Inc , Robert Goodwin and others
Cross_claimant:
Robert Kruse and Dayton Freight Lines, Inc
Cross_defendant:
Robert Kruse and Dayton Freight Lines, Inc
Counter_claimant:
Robert Kruse and Dayton Freight Lines, Inc
Counter_defendant:
Robert Kruse and Dayton Freight Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowery et al v. Halblaub et al
as 1:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Galen Lowery and LeeAnn Lowery
Defendant:
Raymond Halblaub , Kelly Transportation Inc and Dayton Freight Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
