Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Falls v. Jerome et al
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Sherald Dante Falls
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Dr Robert Jerome, A Panos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Jerome
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sean T Benson
Defendant:
Dr Robert Jerome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Jerome
as 2:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Orlando Marquez
Defendant:
Dr Robert Jerome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerber v. Vital Rehabilitation Clinics & Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13898
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Vital Rehabilitation Clinics & Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gerber v. Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06102
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gerber v. Maher et al
as 1:2022cv04304
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Lachlan Joseph Maher, Podiatrist Growth Group LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gerber v. Medcubics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06394
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Medcubics, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Gerber v. Mohawk, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02749
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Mohawk, Inc. and John Does, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Knox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00483
Defendant:
C/O Bender, Nurse Rayburn, Ms. Steelhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
