Cases 1 - 10 of 222
GIBBS v. CVS PHARMACY INC et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Melissa R. Gibbs
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY INC, Record Automatic Doors, Inc. and ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gibbs v. USA
as 3:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Daniel Gibbs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leal v. Pinkerton et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Leal
Defendant:
Lieutenant Pinkerton, Lieutenant Havens, Sargeant Crowson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Pain
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Gibbs and Raymond L Gibbs
Defendant:
Pain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. PRETORIOUSE et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Defendant:
TRISHA PRETORIOUSE, TRISHIA PRETORIUS, KAYLA HALL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Pretoriouse et al
as 3:2023cv01093
Defendant:
Trisha Pretoriouse, Trishia Pretorius, Kayla Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Mickey Gibb
as 23-2930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICKEY GIBB
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14431
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Evan Moore, Ewelina Dymek and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
USA v. Edward Gibbs
as 23-2883
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD GIBBS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
