Cases 1 - 10 of 74
HERZ v. ROTHBERG et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Defendant:
MARC ROTHBERG, EVAN GOODMAN, DAVID F. HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
GOODMAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
RANDY A. GOODMAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SWEIGERT v. GOODMAN et al
as 1:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
D.G. SWEIGERT
Defendant:
JASON GOODMAN, 21ST CENTURY 3D and CROWDSOURCE THE TRUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parmenter et al v. Goodman et al
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Deidre Parmenter and Paul Parmenter
Defendant:
Tamara Goodman and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gill v. GOODMAN CAMPBELL BRAIN AND SPINE
as 1:2022cv01703
Plaintiff:
Dylan Gill
Defendant:
GOODMAN CAMPBELL BRAIN AND SPINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
GILL v. GOODMAN CAMPBELL BRAIN AND SPINE
as 1:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
Dylan Gill
Defendant:
GOODMAN CAMPBELL BRAIN AND SPINE and INDIANAPOLIS NEUROSURGICAL GROUP,P.C DBA GOODMAN CAMPBELL BRAIN AND SPINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SHORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
PAUL M. SHORT
Defendant:
MILLER, GOODMAN and RINEHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. GOODMAN
as 2:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALAN TAYLOR
Defendant:
R. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
