Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and Unknown IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dohl v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv02429
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dohl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and Unknown IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Gonzales v. John Baldwin, et al
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO GONZALES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, IDOC Director, ALONZO L. BOARDMAN, Sgt., JACOB DALTON, Correctional Officer, Lt. and others
Andrew Dowaun v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 21-2957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW DOWAUN
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., Health Care Providers, JOHN BALDWIN, IDOC Director - Ex Director, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Ex-Warden and others
Parker v. Jeffreys
as 1:2020cv02764
Defendant:
IDOC Director Rob Jeffreys
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Doe's et al
as 1:2020cv01740
Defendant:
Chief Engineer, John Doe's, Sheridan C. C. and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Coffey v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST COFFEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ROBERTA FEWS, Deputy Diretor of Department of Corrections, MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health and Psychiatric Services and others
Jarvis Neely v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1177
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director, MARCUS HARDY, Warden, Warden for Stateville CC, JUSTIN WILKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS H. NEELY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
