Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Hill v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv04176
Plaintiff:
Tonetta Hill
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Colleen Delaney, Sherri Baumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stanbridge v. Battington et al
as 4:2024cv04061
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Stanbridge
Defendant:
T Battington, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seger v. Department of Human Services
as 3:2024cv01057
Petitioner:
Logan S Seger
Respondent:
State of Illinois Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
