Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BRODGEN v. ARCHER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00146
Plaintiff: KYREE D. BRODGEN
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, ANDREW ARCHER and J. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2018cv08054
Defendant: Charles F. Best, John/Jane Doe's, Pork and others
Plaintiff: Darryl J. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv03406
Plaintiff: LONNIE J. SUTTON
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sutton v. Pontiac Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff: Marquis J Sutton
Defendant: Michael Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Sutton v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 15-3306
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL J. SUTTON
Defendant - Appellee: PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED
Darryl J. Sutton v. Randy Pfister We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2888
Petitioner - Appellee: DARRYL J. SUTTON
Respondent - Appellant: MARCUS HARDY, Warden and RANDY PFISTER
Sutton v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00217
Plaintiff: Cathy J Sutton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sutton v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv00253
Plaintiff: Darryl J Sutton
Defendant: Marcus Hardy, L. Palmer, J. Dummars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Turner et al
as 1:2011cv01357
Plaintiff: Darryl J Sutton
Defendant: Leslie Turner, Christopher Harrington, Johnny Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Hardy et al
as 1:2009cv08035
Petitioner: Darryl J. Sutton
Respondent: Hardy and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?